What is charisma?

The charisma is wonderful and the wonderful feature of others. According to wisdom prevailing in society, charisma is a divine gift that some people possessed by which they are not placed among everyday people but rather as super people or extraterrestrial people. Charismatic leadership can be heterogeneous as a political, business, religious area. Charisma belongs to the personality of a person. In the simple charisma, personal magnetism. Charisma is that people admire leaders like anything like the Americans after Mr. Richard Nixon even after having participated in a Water Gate scandal. Charisma does not always have a positive effect; they have their own negatives. India's biggest corporate fraud was led by Mr. Ramalinga Raju, one of the most effective and charismatic leaders who led the Satyam Group on one of the most advanced IT solutions in India.

Are your charisma in it?

Every human being acquires charisma against the prevailing wisdom in society. Charisma is often characterized. The trait is an internal characteristic of man such as knowledge, energy, and so on. The qualities needed to acquire knowledge are not born, but charisma is an exceptional feature. The charisma was born in all but different quantities. Some leaders, such as JFK, are born with Bill Clinton's amazing charisma, which they think are talented. The charisma parameters are communication skills, risk taking, authenticity, etc. All these characters are developed by a person, which in turn improves the charisma of a person. According to the assertion theory, charisma depends on people's perception. A person is charismatic if and only when people feel charismatic. Steve Jobs controversy for some people, but some are charismatic, it shows that the charisma of an individual depends on what environment exists. If people need a character and a leader, they are considered charismatic. There are many cases where a man once rejected has later become charismatic as Abraham Lincoln and Ronald Regan. Some people will appear as charismatic leaders after having performed such great speeches as Martin Lutur King, "I Have a Dream …". So charisma can be acquired by an individual. Muthandar al Zeidi, a journalist who took shoes for the US head of state, became charismatic in Iraq overnight, but burning thoughts never went through again, Iraq's blood supply for years required lead and everybody followed him, admiring him

conductor?

Charisma is not an effective leader. Creativity and innovation can lead to anyone in the way of efficiency. If u is able to innovate something like face books or to Microsoft or Google, you will have an effective career at the level of your charisma.

Larry and Sergey Brin have a very low charisma in addition to Stanford University, but hundreds of employees are effectively and Google has a billions of dollars of business. This example demonstrates that charisma is not mandatory for an effective leader. Charisma is just another impetus for a normal driver to become extraordinary. Even without Charisma, the leader can build as an effective leader as he has other management skills at an extraordinary level than Jerry, former Yahoo CEO. Mr. Yang Jerry has a great vision, but still has not managed to achieve charisma for success.

Charisma's room depends on the terrain – charisma in religion and politics has a role in non-business. If you can be convinced of your ideas, you can be effective leaders.

Transformational and Charismatic Leadership

Yes, both charismatic leadership and transformation leadership have similarities as the transformation leader can be charismatic. Charismatic leadership becomes part of the transformational leadership because for a leader to encourage his subordinates to survive their own charisma. The ultimate goal of both leaders is to encourage more workers than they can. Mostly, both leadership concepts are the same but charismatic leader inspired by personal vision, where transformation leaders are aware of and inspired by their employees. The fundamental organization of the transformation leaders is the transformation of the organization, and the charismatic leader for his followers does not change anything. The transformation leaders are mostly charismatic, like Abraham Lincoln. If they are well-intentioned towards others, they can make a bigger move and transform a whole company. The charismatic leader collects followers instead of character and magnetism instead of any form of external powers and influences.

Transformation leaders encourage their subordinates to work for the benefit of the organization, not for their own personal benefit. Charismatic leadership is about creating only the identity of a group that is distinct from the rest of the group. Leaders form a separate view of the group in the minds of the fans so that supporters can easily identify themselves with the group, which in turn gives the supporters a sense of nationality. The charismatic leader has a fantastic self-esteem; always in the conversation, with patience and great willpower. Transformation leaders increase the awareness of the subordinates about the importance of their everyday work and the importance of their implementation. Transformation leaders create subordinates who are aware of their individual expansion, development and implementation requirements. They have a spiritual image of what good things can be in the administration that is in conflict with things. Charismatic leaders have no doubt with this fanfare, and in their own passion and inspiration, they urge their supporters to passionately promote their vision. Charismatic leaders usually have a high level of self-confidence and self-esteem that is more supportive for fans to respect and admire them. Charismatic leaders try to understand the background they are working on. They have many consequences for people's moods and emotions and are trying to personally join them.

All transformation leaders are charismatic, but not all charismatic leading transformations, such as Sam Walton and Abraham Lincoln transformation leaders and charismatic ones. Jim Jones, famous for his charisma, but never transformed

Why flexible?

In our rapidly evolving world, technology advances faster than we can track, as virtually every business is globalizing, and especially since climate change threatens people. In the future, in the future, organizations are looking for managers who have a sustainable management capability. An efficient leader must be flexible. The evolution of the trend suggests that there is one

Flexible and Effective Driving –

The general features of a superior driver are the flexibility of their ability to adapt and adapt to style, as appropriate to context, circumstances and circumstances. Effective leaders have their own choices and will be able to act differently, to think differently and to look for inspiration from various sources. All of these are good qualities of flexible driving, and the flexible driver must make their own decisions without the help of others. The effective leader will have degrees and use the many discipline found on a daily basis and can be adjusted in every position. Leader's motive needs to be catered for to respond to the enormous layout of positions and jobs. Always the leader is often the curiosity that the driving style is the best and want to show their good qualities and want to be patterned to others. Delegates and actually delegates team members. Leaders at all levels require them to be able to get to know exactly what challenges to focus and how to respond. Even the same driving methods and formal programs can change status changes. Common sense alone ensures that the creation of a position can be less effective in a different situation, or if circumstances change for the reason, leaders at all stages encourage the power to know the cause of concern at any time and the best way to to react to the same leadership challenge, the approximate mixing of leadership and formal plans will change the conditioned reaction.

Situational leadership is often considered flexible where a manager needs to work in different situations and can not predict the outcome. The need for people has grown tremendously since the globalized economy needs people with such skills to fit into all kinds of roles. It is an effective leader who understands the group, the goal and to reach it. In general, an efficient manager was task oriented but at times of control of the teams made it more flexible to work in the working environment.

According to the contingency theory, no guiding principle meets any situation, an effective leader has many leadership styles and uses it to the situation.

Source by Bharath Kumar Reddy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *